Thursday, 13 October 2022

Extremes

The other day I was sipping tea by my balcony's window,

You know those languid hours, when ideas mostly come and go,

A strong wind swept across the trees, making them howl and bend a little low,

It just left me wondering, what really distinguishes a compassionate presence from just bland ego.


Why is cool such a nice way to be, yet cold is utterly frowned upon,

Why love always feels so warm, but hot is all about temper preferred to be long gone,

Breezes are always so gentle and moving, but winds keep howling in turbulence,

Good memories serve as gentle reminders of hope, yet trauma is reminiscent of a past quite violent.


Morning sunshine inspires us all, yet the afternoon heat scorches us to shreds,

Gentle showers revive us from despair, but violent rains wash away everything in floods.


Extremes and temperance, much like yin and yang,

Prevail through our lives and nature, just like the two parallel riverbanks,

Extremes create and destroy in abundance,

Temperance manages the in-betweens, making for great indulgence,

It is but human nature to always shun pain and yearn for pleasure,

Little do we know that they draw from the same source, they are a part of the same treasure.

Wednesday, 28 September 2022

Untoward ways of life

Rise from the ashes, why don’t you? 

Why the ashes, you’ll ask, won’t you? 

That which no more serves you has been burnt down, you can see, can’t you? 

A new self shall emerge from the ashes, that’s why the ashes, they are for the ‘new’ you. 


The seasons, nature’s playful art, are there for all of us to celebrate: 

Some moments happy, some sad, others awful, a few even great! 

But even there, the spring proceeds the autumn, blooming in all its glory around, 

The dry wilted leaves need to be shed down, for the fresh new ones to grow abound. 


After the previous, comes the next, the next leads to something even more away, 

These cycles, so many, sometimes lead us to light, at times make us go astray. 

Never ending are these plays, confusing us to the core, right or wrong, what do we do? 

Do we embrace the next, or should we hold on, where do we go? 


We are mere characters in the grand scheme of things, so they say:

It’s cruel to imagine that one thing has to die for something else to find its way, 

Sadly, all of the attachments would then always end in pain, all the love and memories would finally go vain, 

Perhaps that’s the lesson, painful yet profound, we all leave everything behind; loss is a way to a new gain.


Sunday, 25 September 2022

Toxic

Toxic, wow I love that word, 

Labels chase you everywhere, quite absurd! 

Everything that fails must be toxic, 

And everything that shines is clean, 

Doesn't really add up, nothing's all toxic and not every shine is all that clean. 


Between 'what is' and 'what should be', there's a thin line: 

This side you are forever tormented, the other side you end up just fine. 

This side you are totally toxic, that side quite clean, 

This side you embrace the darkness, that side has its own sheen. 


The Judges, they sit in the heavens, their messengers: they are all around, 

All of them unappointed, their judgements all flawed, yet they float abound. 

The sun shining through the morning sky, the moon engulfed in the night's gloom, 

Both are innocent souls: one gets the light, the other haunted by perpetual doom. 


Destiny gets decided in the heavens, they say: must be quite a sight, 

One's black, the other grey, some are even white! 

Angles and Demons: sometimes opposites yet sometimes they are the same, 

An Angel if what it does bears fruit, a demon if it goes vain.

Friday, 25 February 2022

Us


All Art, no matter how insufferable, matters. Art Credit: Aman Saxena.

                                                     

I wonder why I won't let you go,

Why do I keep being with you just like a string with a bow?

What's that bond which binds me to you,

What makes me think that, perhaps, you feel it too?

 

Times, they are changing, you feel really stuck,

You still have memories, those you couldn't just chuck;

You go around with friends, none know how you feel,

You go about life, as if you were a part of some show reel.

 

It pains me to see you so, my love it just feels shaken,

To see you this way, to see that you'll eventually be taken :(

I just wish wherever you are, you find some happiness,

Some respite from the dreary madness.

 

As for me, I might just manage to be myself,

I don't know if that’s of any worth to you, or your future self;

I wish you always run back to me, to seek that love, that shelter within me,

I wish you too feel what you have always just seen in me.


Wednesday, 27 October 2021

याद

 

कुछ पल तो जिया था मैं, करार भी था कुछ, बेचैनी भी थी कभी

कभी बेपरवाह था तो कभी लापरवाह, आवारगी कहते थे उसे सभी ।

धूप सुनहरी है, आसमान में है बदली, चाँदनी ख़िलती है आज़ भी अभी

पर आती नहीं मन के बागान पर वो बहारें, जो आती थीं कभी ॥

Saturday, 22 August 2020

‘Dilwale Dulhaniya Le Jayenge’ is Overrated. Here’s Why.

‘Dilwale Dulhaniya Le Jayenge’, popularly referred to as ‘DDLJ’, is, perhaps, the National romantic movie of India. I mean our grandfathers swore by ‘Mughal-e-Azam’ in their good days and our fathers by, say, ‘Aradhana’ with Rajesh Khanna singing in a Jeep moving along a mountain road. We swear by ‘DDLJ’, a much-needed acronym for a movie from the decade famous for its long movie titles. I have ‘experienced’ the movie twice in my short life. Once as a kid from the 90s and once as an adult, horrified by the way the movie gave Shah Rukh Khan a license to act in films with their own twisted and ridiculous notions about love and romance.

I have to admit that I like the film still and it would be improper to say that the movie is ridiculous or insane. Saying so would be hurting the judgement of the audiences that have shown so much love for the movie over the years. It would be proper, however, to say that its notions are ridiculous and insane. But before exploring its bizarre notions two things need to be said.

Firstthe movie is overrated. And Shah Rukh Khan is not be blamed, ignorantly, for that. He acted and acted well in a movie that was offered to him at a point in his career when he was happy doing Anti-hero roles in movies like ‘Darr’, ‘Anjaam’ and ‘Baazigar’. I believe that a lot of undeserved praise is heaped on ‘DDLJ’ while films like ‘Dil Se’, from the same artist, have been underrated. And it is the audiences’ perception that needs to blamed, if at all we choose to blame anyone. As far as the artists of the movies are considered they are to be praised at all costs because while they were working on both kinds of movies, they had no idea what the future held for them. It could be a fact that Shah Rukh Khan is as surprised as me at the fact that ‘DDLJ’ has made it so far. It is still running in Maratha Mandir, a cinema hall in Mumbai suburbs, while some of his far better works have been ‘arthouse-esque’ relics, which serve his critics well when they feel like panning ‘DDLJ’.

Second, the movie’s success has a lot to do with the music of the film than its lead pair’s acting skills or the direction and screenplay. I give a huge credit of its success to Jatin-Lalit, Kumar Sanu, Udit Narayan and Lata Mangeshkar. When I watched the movie as a kid, I liked the movie locales and the songs of the movie. Raj (Shah Rukh Khan), wearing a Harley Davidson Jacket, with Simran (Kajol) in his arms in a beautiful mustard field to the tunes of ‘Tujhe Dekha Toh Yeh Jaana Sanam’. I was awestruck with the European locations, the songs and the colorful clothes of the actors, the wedding scenes. I was a kid back then and had no idea about how screenplay works in movies. I did not suffer much because ‘DDLJ’ didn’t have much of both. When I grew up and watched it again, I had mixed feelings. I had a ‘feel good’ feeling after hearing those classic songs as well as the locales and a little bit situational comedy. But at the same time, I could clearly see that why despite the acting as well as writing having notable flaws, ‘DDLJ’ is not only a hit but enjoys massive cult following.

The ‘feel good’ feeling.


I do not understand to this day that what filmmakers like Aditya Chopra mean when they bring India into their movie theme. Are they filmmakers or salesmen? It is okay if Ashutosh Gowariker brings India into a film like ‘Swades’ because he means something, a change in people’s perspective. But ‘DDLJ’ seems to me like a product sold under the garb of patriotism to Indians and, significantly, Non-Residents (NRIs) to just appeal to more crowds than the film could attract otherwise. And the justifications which the film provides for its ‘Indian-ness’ are laughable, at best.

Let me elaborate a little. What exactly are Raj’s father Dharamvir Malhotra (Anupam Kher) and Simran’s father Baldev Singh Chaudhary (Amrish Puri) doing in London? Well, Dharamvir Malhotra is a millionaire businessman (apparently a high-school dropout) and Baldev Singh is a shop-owner. Both of them are making money. But we hear them rambling almost a hundred times about the greatness of India, the greatness of its soil and its rivers. And not just them, almost every other actor, Raj and Simran especially, are blabbering some vague notions about ‘Indian-ness’. I say that why leave India if one loves it so much. It is clear that both of them left it to make more money, an unlikely proposition in India.


Raj and his father drink expensive champagne on his failing to pass the University exams. They playfully dismiss people who study hard and enjoy the wealth they have made in London. But to marry off his son, Malhotra wants an Indian bride. Thames seems a distant second to Ganges for him but he has lived in his mansion in London, a city by the Thames, his entire life. Raj apparently has seen a lot of women, is a drunkard, even cheats on a shopkeeper to buy beer, but does not touch a drunk Simran to prove his ‘Indian-ness’. He could have done better. ‘India-ness’ has a lot more to it than what Raj thinks. Baldev has a family in London but does not take well to the western culture. He wants to preserve his culture by deporting his daughter forcibly to India to marry her off to his friend’s son, whom she has never even met once. He calls it an Indian tradition. It is hypocrisy, by the way, for the lack of a better word.

Despite these twisted perspectives, these people wear ‘Indian-ness’ as a badge on their sleeves. Enjoying their lives in a different country and trying to justify their hypocrisy by labelling every ridiculous thing they do as ‘Indian’. As I said, it is a good way to strike a chord with the NRI audience as well as residents by fondling with their insane notions about ‘Indian-ness’.

Creepy is the new cool, since 1995


We all have blown whistles when Raj lets out his hand to Simran to help her board the train. But what happens next is not something worth whistling. How does one behave with a woman one just met? By flashing her bra in front of her and then practically wriggling into her. Raj almost has his head in Simran’s lap when her friend comes to her rescue. How cool is that? People might call it the way ‘it’ happens but clearly Raj sure proves that he is an ‘Indian’ by doing that. I would expect a better Raj had DDLJ been made with just a little more thought.

Love is blind and ‘stupid’ too

I sometimes wonder what the scriptwriter had in mind when he was writing the movie. Raj nags Simran for marrying a man whom she has barely met. It is completely understandable. It is quite obvious, from the way he nags her, that he is attracted to her. What puzzles me here is that how has he fallen in ‘love’ with a stranger he met a few days before and has spent one or two days with. That is basically the same thing he has been nagging about to Simran. Raj is no better than her father’s choiceAdditionally, he is a proven pervert. And the way Simran responds by turning back when Raj expects her to, is equally psychic. How love happens in this movie, is as messed up as its other parts.


On top of that, Raj’s psychic instincts do not just go away like that. When he decides to go back to see Simran and tell her about his love, he finds that she has left for India. It is interesting to see how he finds that Simran loves him back too. He finds a bell hanging outside her house, the one he had given her when they had parted after their holiday. He takes it as a symbol of her love.


Really! I mean she could have left it just outside her house thinking it was useless to take back to India. How intelligent of Raj to fly back all his way to India just because he found a bell outside her house. It is no wonder that the audiences choose to ignore all of it. Because they have the ‘feel-good’ feeling.

The Convenient Ending


The climax of the movie is too much dramatic when Simran’s father lets her go with Raj on the train. But I do not get the hang of it. This is because what they both leave behind is equally messy as their supposed ‘Happily ever after’ lives would be. Let us think about Kuljeet (Parmeet Sethi). A happy man about to be married. Everyone in his family is excited, all his relatives have come to attend his wedding. Enter Raj, his friend whom he has brought home. Only to realize later that the same man betrays him and runs away with his bride. He ends up beaten, dejected and humiliated.


Baldev, a man of Indian values who has come to India to marry his daughter off only to let her run away with a stranger who had earlier lied to him to buy beer from his store in London. Preeti (Mandira Bedi), who, though mistaken, likes Raj and finds herself cheated not because Raj does not like her back but because he was an imposter looking to grind his own axe. The list goes on. Not even a convincing end to the story.

Final Word


The movie lacks realism and is notional in its conceptualization of everything: love and India, for example. The reason for its immense popularity is perhaps its music and its ‘lack of realism.’ An average cine-goer goes into the cinema hall with an expectation to watch something over-the-top and not something realistic. Realism is perhaps sought by the intelligentsia who have the time and resources to debate over movies. The common man, perhaps, wants a relief from his already sad ‘realistic’ life, he doesn’t want the same life depicted on the celluloid screen. He wants some magic. ‘DDLJ’ does that and more. It gives him the ‘feel good’ feeling.

Originally published on thecinemaholic.com on 6th October, 2017.

Wednesday, 19 August 2020

Podcast: Ramblings, Mostly. Season 1, Episode 2: 19 August, 2020.

A layman's look at the roots and branches of Nepotism in India. Is Indian Film Industry the worst case scenario of Nepotism ? Is it entirely the system's fault ? Maybe.

Listen to it here.

Extremes

The other day I was sipping tea by my balcony's window, You know those languid hours, when ideas mostly come and go, A strong wind swept...